|
[Return
to english page]
THE
BROTHERS OF JESUS
Some
people think that Jesus had brothers, other sons Mary had
from Joseph after His birth. They refer to the following
texts to conclude that the Mother of Jesus did not remain
virgin:
-Mark
6,3 (Matthew 12,46): "The brothers of Jesus: James,
Joset, Jude and Simon
".
-Luke
2,7: "She gave birth to her firstborn son". So there are
others.
-Matthew
1,25: "He (Joseph) knew her not till she had brought
forth her firstborn son, and named Him Jesus". They
conclude that Joseph "knew" Mary afterwards.
-John
7,5: "Even His brothers did not believe in
Him".
Answer
In
the oriental mentality, even today, cousins, children of
the same village, children growing together are
considered "brothers". Generally speaking, all the Arabs
consider themselves "brothers". The Bible, emanating from
an oriental background, uses often the word "brother" to
indicate cousins or people from the same village. There
are many biblical examples in the Old
Testament:
-Genesis
13,8 and 14,16: Abram is indicated as Lot's brother, but
he is his uncle.
-Deuteronomy
15,2-3: "Any creditor holding a personal pledge obtained
from his brother (a Jew) shall release it
a
foreigner (a non-Jew) you may exploit".
-Leviticus
19,17: "You will not harbour hatred for your brother (a
Jew)
".
-1
Chronicles 23,22: Kish and Eleazar are brothers. The sons
of Kish are said to be the brothers of the daughters of
Eleazar, yet they are their cousins, not their brothers
as says the text.
John
19,25-27: Mary, Cleopas's wife (see Luke 24,18) cannot be
the sister of Mary, Jesus' mother, but she is her cousin,
considered as her sister according to the well-known
oriental mentality. Indeed, there could have not have
been two sisters named Mary in the same
family.
"Woman
this is your son
this is your mother" (John
19,26-27): John is not Mary's son, neither is she his
physical mother. The relation here is
spiritual.
If
Mary had other sons, why was John to "take her into his
home"? Mary would have gone with her other sons? Some
people will answer: She went with John because "even His
brothers did not believe in Him" (John 7,5).
Our
answer: these "brothers" are Jesus' fellow countrymen,
inhabitants of Nazareth, Jesus' birth town. These people
did not believe in Him and Jesus even said about them:
"In truth I tell you, no prophet is ever accepted in his
own country" (Luke 4,24). Therefore, the already
mentioned James, Joset, Jude and Simon are not His
physical brothers. Moreover, they believed in Him and
even became His disciples (see James' and Jude's letters
and Acts 1,14 and 12,17 / 1 Corinthians 9,5 and 15,6 /
Galatians 1,19). His other "brothers" from Nazareth did
not believe in him.
Mark
15,40: "Mary mother of James and Joset" is Cleopa's wife,
who is said to be Mary's "sister" in John 19,25-27. She
is the mother of James, Joset, Jude and Simon. She is
considered "sister" of the Virgin Mary; therefore her
sons are considered Jesus' "brothers" although they are
cousins or even close friends.
Some
people also say that Mark 15,40 speaks of Jesus' Mother.
Had this been the case, Mark would have written: "Mary,
mother of Jesus, James, Joset, Jude and Simon",
Jesus being the firstborn.
The
"brothers" of Jesus have never been called "Mary's
sons".
James
defines himself as "servant of the Lord Jesus Christ",
not as His brother (James 1,1).
Jude
says that he is "servant of Jesus Christ and brother of
James", not of Jesus.
Some
may still answer that Jesus had other brothers and that
they are the ones considered as His brothers. Why, then,
does not the Bible mention them and only talks about
James, Joset, Jude and Simon who, as we have
demonstrated, are His relatives?
Saying
that Jesus is the "firstborn" does not mean He had other
brothers. In the oriental mentality, even nowadays, the
firstborn has a special importance. His parents are even
called by his name: Father of Jesus, Mother of Jesus and
no more by their own name: Joseph and Mary. Furthermore,
parents offer the firstborn to God for his particular
moral importance. (Luke 2,22-23). The firstborn boy is
called "firstborn" whether he has other brothers and
sisters or not.
The
fact that Joseph had not known Mary "until" Jesus' birth
does not mean that he knew her afterwards. The Bible does
not say it and we are not allowed to conclude it. What
Matthew simply means to say is that Jesus was born from
Mary without a sexual relation with Joseph; he merely
wants to underline the miraculous side of Jesus' birth.
This is Matthew's only intention, he does not want to go
further and we are not allowed to draw conclusions
without biblical proofs.
As
far as we are concerned, we have demonstrated that Jesus'
"brothers" are His near relatives and His fellow
countrymen. There are no verses in the Gospel indicating
that Jesus had physical brothers.
"Who
is my mother? Who are my brothers?" Jesus said and,
indicating his disciples he added: "Here are my
mother and my brothers" (Matthew 12,48-50). The true
brothers of Jesus are in the whole world; these brothers
are His disciples.
Appearing
to Mary of Magdala and to Mary of Cleopa after His
resurrection, Jesus told them: "Go and tell my
brothers
" (Matthew 28,10)
and Mary of
Magdala hurried up to "go to the disciples and
tell them that she has seen the Lord" (John 20,17-18).
She knew Jesus had no brothers, but disciples. All Jesus'
disciples are His brothers since "He gave them the power
to become children of God" (John 1,12). God is His Father
by divine nature and their Father by adoption (John
20,17). Their faith in Jesus makes them sons of God and
brothers of Jesus (John 1,12). Read Hebrews
2,11-13.
Conclusion
Mary
remained virgin. She had no other sons but Jesus. Her
physical virginity has a spiritual deep meaning, which
refers to her complete union with God. Mary would have
not sinned had she known Joseph sexually: she was his
legal bride. But She could not give herself to a man,
because her heart belonged completely to God. She is the
Bride of the Holy Spirit, the worthy and perfect
accomplice of God's plan of salvation. Like any woman in
love, She could not belong to anyone else but
God.
Furthermore,
by a special and unique grace, God has spared Mary from
the original sin. He has kept her immaculate, since her
conception. God's incarnation could not happen in a
troubled soul. Mary has not been troubled by the original
sin, the consequences of which disturb, indeed, all of
us. Feeling herself untouched by the original sin, She
joyfully exclaimed: "My soul glorifies the Lord and my
spirit rejoices in God my Saviour" (Luke
1,46-47).
Thus,
only Mary has been preserved immaculate, to keep her soul
in peace in order to receive the Word of God who, in Her,
"became flesh". God could not incarnate Himself through a
tarnished soul. This is the secret of Mary's Immaculate
Conception.
Some
people reason humanly thinking that Mary could not have
remained virgin after Jesus' birth. But God, who created
the body of Jesus in Mary's womb without touching her
virginity, can conceive Jesus within Her by respecting
her virginity! "For nothing is impossible to God" (Luke
1,37). Mary's virginity purifies the hearts of those who
put their trust in Her and restores their spiritual
virginity (Revelation 14,4).
"She
is an enclosed garden, my sister, my promised
bride, an enclosed garden, a sealed
fountain" says the divine "Bridegroom" about His Spouse,
the Messiah's Mother, in the Song of Songs
4,12.
N.B.:
Those who deny Mary's virginity claim the
free interpretation of the Bible.
They should be coherent with themselves and allow the
others also their freedom to interpret. They should also
meditate on Saint Peter's words: "No prophecy of the
Scripture is of any private interpretation
" (2
Peter 1,20).
[Return]
|